Home

Advertisement

Customize
Guy

Spider-Man 3

I don't write movie review any more, but if I did, I would probably certainly maybe consider saying some of these things about this movie, which I saw the other night...





1) It seems like a lot of critics are really down on this movie, and looking at the IMDB ratings, I guess viewers are, too. I don't really understand all of that. One guy even suggested that this movie wasn't on par with the first two. Personally, I thought the first one was cheesy as hell (and still think that), but the second one was spectacular (probably because it was partially written by Michael Chabon). This movie was better than the first. Of course, maybe I can be more objective because I don't know a thing about comics and I don't really like the typical summer movies that everyone likes.

2) That said, it was a little bit Too Much. Too Much story. Too many bad guys. Too man plot devices. Too many fight scenes. Too many well known actors (did we really need that guy from that talking pig movie?).

3) The ending crossed over in the Return of the King territory. There were a lot of sentimental moments, some tears, and some more tears. I kept expecting Ari from Entourage to pop up and say "Hug it out, Bitch."

4) After a movie and a half of Harry being on the vengeance path, we suddenly have a minor (very minor) character popping up out of the woodwork to tell him he was all wrong. That was kind of stupid. It wasn't quite a deus ex machina, but it was certainly lazy writing.

5) For some reason they felt the need to change the story and say the cops screwed up and never really got the guy who killed Peter's uncle. This made no sense. I realize they wanted extra motivation to make Spider-man go half nuts, but still. Again, this was lazy writing.

6) I can't believe someone would bring in Bryce Dallas Howard for a movie and then rob her of her most interesting feature--the red hair. It's not like making her blonde suddenly made her into a supermodel type--another stretch plot device. We all can see her all kinds of naked in Manderlay when she's having her Mandingo fantasies, and she is certainly not built like a model.

7) Sam Raimi went back to his Evil Dead days and brought in Bruce Campbell for some comic relief. That was kind of cool.

8) Speaking of comic relief, there is a lot of it. Maybe too much. I think what ultimately makes these movies less interesting than Bryan Singer's X-Men films or Chris Nolan & Tim Burton's Batman films is that they aren't as dark or serious. That said, there is enough character development and story to not make it complete cheese, like 90% of comic book movies. It is comparable to Ang Lee's Hulk film...maybe a bit better.

9) The last movie had like a 10 minute section where music is playing and Tobey is acting goofy and it all reminds me of that annoying part of the Butch/Sundance movie that features bicycle riding and a Burt Bacharach song. This movie has an even longer musical section, which I actually thought was okay at first...until a big dance sequence broke out. That was ridiculous. I get the feeling that these movies are going to keep getting campier until Raimi has turned Spider-man into Army of Darkness.

10) Back to comic relief, there was a cool scene towards the end where old friends reunite and it could have actually been one of the cheesy, sentimental moments that worked--had it not quickly turned into a "Buddy Cop" type moment. The next few minutes of action were filled with bad one liners going back and forth like Danny Glover and Mel Gibson...I hated that.

Comments

You mention a great many things I thought when I saw it last night.
I speak for the people.
I didn't see the first or second ones because I am not a fan of Tobey Maguire or Kirsten Dunst. But I went to see this one because I'm a good wife like that. I wasn't impressed. And the ending scene where Tobey is making those crying faces over Harry's death was lame. I started laughing.
But Tobey is great...he's done so many good movies...like Wonder Boys...and Cider House Rules...and he even made Seabiscuit watchable....
What I thought was funny about that was not necessarily that Tobey did a bad job (I think that it was the closeup on his face while he was crying and not necessarily the faces he was making that made that scene unbearable) but that you could almost see Dunst looking over at him and trying as hard as she could to mimic what he was doing.
I think the movie should have ended in the church with the simbote falling onto Brock. Had they done that, they could have taken some extra time to make the black suit actually mean something (not to mention the professor's experiments with it being put to some actual use other than: "yeah.. don't wear this as a hat, man. It would make an ugly hat"). At the very least, it could have been shown to do more than turn Peter Parker into a moody little emo kid.
but, c'mon...he looked just like he was in the Killers...that's A BAD GUY.
I probably won't see this. I saw the first one but never felt strongly enough about it to see the second one. Movies based on comics never go over well with me for some reason. But seeing a review from you was a nice treat.
that's because you're all sally serious and shit and can only enjoy movies about boring people sobbing it up and crying about their spilled milk for three hours--with subtitles. i know your type. snob!
Whatever. We like the same kind of movies. Your netflix similarity rating is way up there on my list.
You lie! I only watch buddy flicks or Michael Bay movies!
yeah. me too!
Guy

July 2007

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Advertisement

Customize